« April 2006 | Main | June 2006 »

Wednesday, 31 May 2006

Dear Duane

Last month when I wrote a blurb about "Good Night and Good Luck," I made a throwaway mention of an ad the local NBC affiliate was running a lame ad denigrating the supposedly inferior weather coverage of their rival station.  Poor Duane Lammers can't buy a break.  Last winter the lowbrow moralizing general manager of WTWO put his neck through the door refusing to air NBC's failed drama "Book of Daniel," but now this month his station's not-even-worthy-of-Ron-Burgundy stunt ended up in the hands of the Daily Show producers. 

You can see how that turned out. 

Somehow, I'm sure this only reinforces his confidence in his personal victimization by the debauched "cable industry," and he's probably going to find a way (if he hasn't already) to turn it into another liberal bogeyman to lay on to his ultra-conservative viewership base.  So it doens't really do any good to laugh at him.  But you can't help it.  Rest easy knowing that our buddy Duane and his crew nightly pesonify the pillowy-soft, unchallanging fluff that makes local television news unmitigated garbage, and sometimes blowhard jackasses get what's coming to them. 

Tuesday, 30 May 2006

American dream team

Honestly, you can't tell me you aren't looking forward to this.  Come on, Robert Altmann and Garrison Keillor on the same project?  It isn't fair'; not at all.  You know you want to see it.  Unfortunately, you also know you don't want to take me to see it with you, so I guess I'll have to walk/hitchhike/drive wildly and illegally to go see it. 

Monday, 29 May 2006

Good cop, bad cop

Anthony Lane takes a butcherknife to "The Da Vinci Code" in last week's New Yorker,

There has been much debate over Dan Brown’s novel ever since it was published, in 2003, but no question has been more contentious than this: if a person of sound mind begins reading the book at ten o’clock in the morning, at what time will he or she come to the realization that it is unmitigated junk? The answer, in my case, was 10:00.03, shortly after I read the opening sentence: “Renowned curator Jacques Saunière staggered through the vaulted archway of the museum’s Grand Gallery.” With that one word, “renowned,” Brown proves that he hails from the school of elbow-joggers—nervy, worrisome authors who can’t stop shoving us along with jabs of information and opinion that we don’t yet require. (Buried far below this tic is an author’s fear that his command of basic, unadorned English will not do the job; in the case of Brown, he’s right.) You could dismiss that first stumble as a blip, but consider this, discovered on a random skim through the book: “Prominent New York editor Jonas Faukman tugged nervously at his goatee.” What is more, he does so over “a half-eaten power lunch,” one of the saddest phrases I have ever heard.

For someone who is ostensably a writer, I'm ashamed to say I don't read a great deal of formal writing.  This can be good or bad, depending on whether you find it better to avoid being swayed by bad writing or influenced by good writing.  I started writing based mostly on imitation, as I imagine most people do, but for whatever reason some people who read a lot can't channel it into better writing.  And, no matter how much I read Roger Angell, I'm never going to approach anything he does, either.  I feel presently like I'm going back to the well for the same conventions I've always used, even though I'm actively trying to read more sophisticated prose and hope some of it will rub off.  Well, I don't imagine that's going to work out.  I have this fear that I'm sliding into monotany and gibberish and am the only one who's not aware of that fact. 

Sunday, 28 May 2006

The race winner of Defiance, Ohio

Hornish spoils Andretti family reunion, wins second-closest Indy 50o in history.

This was exactly what Michael and Marco Andretti had talked about: down to the end of the Indy 500, father and son running 1-2.

"A fairy tale," they called it, and they were sure it was coming true Sunday. Sam Hornish Jr. thought so, too.

Then, with one dazzling last-second move, Hornish whipped around the 19-year-old rookie on the final straightaway and won the second-closest Indy ever, by .0635 seconds, a little more than a car length.

"Second place is nothing," Marco said. "They don't remember people who finish second here. They really don't. You gotta take advantage of every shot. How many times did my dad finish second? He never won it and neither did I."

How bad is it that SportsIllustrated.com sticks us in the NASCAR section?  Oh well, I'll take it.  That was an astonishing finishes, one of those moments that you invest your time into watching sports hoping you'll get to see a handful like it in your life.  IMS historian and radio broadcaster Donald Davidson said afterward, "It was just like in the movies, like a corny movie."  Except it happened.  Sometimes it does. 

Friday, 26 May 2006

The boys are back in town

Thanks to the incredibly thorough documentaries packaged with the "Lord of the Rings" extended edition DVD's, I got to know Peter Jackson's behind-the-scenes team of editors, designers and animators with a recognition factor rivaling that of the primary cast and crew.  So although I wouldn't normally be drawn to a remake of "King Kong," curiosity got the better of me, and besides, I owed it to Richard Taylor and the rest of PJ"s crew to see what they could do for an encore.

And, I"m happy to say, the movie looks and sounds fabulous.  Unfortunately, that's about all the captured my interest, and it wasn't enough to hold it for the entirety of three hours.  I know it's absurd to be a stickler for believability in a movie about a giant gorilla on an undiscovered island, but the lavish pursuit to unleash increasingly more comical trauma on the characters while they still manage to escape unharmed is beginning to stretch past the point where I'm willing to suspend disbelief. (Plus, I'm terribly afraid of heights, even in the cinema.) 

Kong himself is like a lot of men you might know:  an chest-thumping, reckless oaf until he gets a pretty girl to dance and juggle and do tricks for him.  I suppose the film wants us to see him as lonely and misunderstood, and feel sadness when he finally gets pincushioned by biplanes on the Empire State Building, but the movie didn't do enough to get that reaction from me.  Perhaps that's illiberal of me, and I might be abandonimg my usual misanthropy but just because he's more sympathetic than Carl Denham or Englehorn isn't good enough, since being a little better than the devil isn't much to hang your furry hat on. 

Wednesday, 24 May 2006

The Famile stoned

If you've been inside a church that plays "contemporary" worship music in the last 10 years, it's possible you're familiar with a composition of Daniel Smith.  Don't let him fool you.  Smith's primary musical vehicle, begun as a senior thesis in college, is known as Danielson, and with a loose association of blood relation and otherwise called the Famile he has built some of the most curious and bizarre experimental indie rock since his beginnings in 1995. 

His latest record is "Ships," which, besides being a Famile reunion, is a whole-hog party for quirk-rock nerds, with Smith enlisting the contribution of Deerhof, Why?, Serena Maneesh, Half-Handed Cloud and some guy named Stevens you've probably never heard of.  It's beyond my powers to describe exactly what's happening on this record (you can hear a couple of songs on Danielson's myspace, including the standout "Cast It At the Setting Sail") so I'll defer to the professional press (and there's been quite a lot of it). 

Dusted:

Smith’s voice remains his most recognizable calling card. It’s almost infinitely malleable, bending and straining but never breaking, always scraping above and beyond where the top of his range should be. It’s almost impossible to imagine the person from whom such a voice would emerge. I can only envision some kind of mask, frozen with a look of (only somewhat creepy) glee. He’s not always happy, but even in the minor-key moments, there’s a sense of hope in the background. And that’s where religion comes into the picture.

PopMatters:

It’s awfully tough to categorize Smith’s songs, which make for adventurous sailing over rough seas. One minute you’re amazed by the innocent beauty of it all and the next you’re almost certain somebody sneakily recorded the church toddlers singing over random instrumental music, then called it Danielson. Think of this latter description as aural seasickness. Although it often seems like one big lark, Danielson is no joke. Smith is featured at length in interview segments during the excellent “Why Should The Devil Have All The Good Music?” documentary, and he comes off as a thoughtful, intelligent, and quite serious young man. So why does he seem to revert to childhood whenever he sings? That’s for him – or his psychologist—to know, and us to figure out if we can.

And Pitchfork, which gave the record a 9.1 rating

In his decade-long run as the ringleader of art-rock collective the Danielson Famile, Daniel Smith has practically defined the term "cult artist." His records-- most of them highly conceptual paeans to God-- can be exhausting, barraging listeners with surprise twists and turns and tangled song fragments. Smith himself has an inimitable vocal style: a twisted melange of bleating, twinging yelps, whoops, and screeches. Yet Smith's discography has yielded him a small but unflaggingly loyal congregation, drawn to music that, above all else, is uninhibitedly gleeful, celebratory, and rallying-- the kind of inspired communal rejoicing that's highly contagious.

I was first aware of Danielson from his first series of releases on Tooth and Nail Records, which were largely underappreciated and often derided by the Christian indie rock world he was being sold to, and, suffice to say, nothing from the art-deaf Christian music world as a whole.  So it was a surprise to me to see them turn up as indie darlings for Bloomington's Secretly Canadian, where they've been since 2001.  It's an acquired taste, for sure, but those can be the most fun to tackle. 

Sunday, 21 May 2006

If I had a hammer...

It seems like I always get the most readers when this blog goes into an occasional slumber.  Or, perhaps it's not more readers but simply the few of you hitting refresh more often.  If so, by golly you should know better than to expect updates that frequently!

Anyway, I think I'm back on the wagon, so hopefully I'll have something new on "Capote" and the new Danielson record that's getting lots of plaudits from the indie snobs (huh, guess I can't make fun of them anymore eh?) 

Tero Palmroth was a little-known Finnish driver who made several appearances at Indianapolis in the late '80's-early 90's who wasn't really memorable in any way except that was the time I was in my formative years and have the same fondness for the back-of-the-pack runners from those days as the old-time hawks have about the 60's and 70's.  So in some respects, I suppose I can feel their pain.  At 8, I thought he had a cool name like my first favorite racer Emerson Fitipaldi (the seeds of my doughy internationalism were sown in a shallow pond). 

Saturday, 20 May 2006

My bad novel is better than your bad novel

So what are we going to make of "The Da Vinci Code?"  Legitimate controversy-stoking potboiler or just another excuse for certain Christians to beg for more persecution?  Somehow, I don't have the heart to tell anyone in the surging "Da Vinci debunkers" cottage industry that hardly any reputable historian takes Dan Brown's quasi-fiction conspiracy theories seriously.  Heck, even the notoriously Jesus-hating Salon ran a three-page piece last year smudging up the half-baked nonsense that has got the Bible-tyrants crowing.  But I do understand their pain; if anyone knows where to find people who'll fall for any slippery crackpot hoax regardless of logic, they would. 

In fact, you might even say they have their own badly-written bestsellers based on some far-fetched futuristic hooters.   Perhaps you've heard of them...

Tuesday, 16 May 2006

The Tero Palmroth society

As it does every May, my attention turns irrevocably to the Indianapolis 500, much to the bewilderment and annoyance of the people who read this site, I'm sure.  I'm not entirely sure why it remains so, given the race's association with Memorial Day and the excessive display of military pagentry that comes with it.  This is probably what draws out the inevitable jingoistic element that we can't seem to escape in discussing the Indianapolis 500, but then, perhaps it's the schadenfraude in their eternal consternation that the sport stubbornly refuses to cave to their prejudices that keeps me coming back for more. 

In many people's eyes, of course, auto racing has always had a tenuous claim to the title of "sport."  Indeed, many people who claim to be fans of the sport are moreso fans of the business.  A common chorus you might hear this time of year if you've got your ear to the ground goes something like "Well, Car Owner B hiring Boris Forriner to drive his car isn't going to put any more fans in the seats" or "Fans cannot relate to Tiny Brazilian; Car Owner proves once again he does not care what the fans want."  Given the reduced popularity of American formula racing in recent years, this is usually framed as a guilt-trip on how, if things do not shape up in the near future, our sport will die an ignonimous death on the cross of American public apathy. 

That all sounds a bit ridiculous to people who think of sports as first and foremost fair and meritorious competitions, regardless of whether or not the fans like the outcome.  I'm sure many men's tennis pundits in the USA alarmed about the game's slide in popularity would very much like to be rid of Roger Federer, but there's not much they can legitimately do about it without facing scorn unmerciful.  The ambiguity of auto racing, however, allows for these kinds of machinations.  Auto racing is a very context-sensitive competition, and between the many disciplines and levels, things can become very fluid, and as with many things, it depends on how much truth the teller wants to tell.  Blame for a poor performance by a popular driver can be shuffled onto the team, bad luck or other circumstances, while good performances by an unpopular driver can be downplayed while his missteps are unduly magnified. 

So it is not always indisputable that one driver is better than another, and there are usually undertaken many manner of rhetorical aerobics to establish that Joe American is better than Boris Forriner after all, and, even if he is not, by golly it doesn't matter because he's more popular anyway and that's what it's all about.  (If I have explained this poorly, it's because no explanation exists that does not defy common sense.   I think what we are dealing with here is a merger between a fringe of society finding a refuge after its xenophobia crumbled in other sports, and the offspring of Sports Radio Nation, where The Fan has the right to dictate whatever outcome pleases him, irrespective of fair and honest competition or all that other antiquated nonsense.) 

Tuesday, 09 May 2006

Got dough?

Sony to sell Playstation 3 for arm, leg $500

The console will be released on Nov. 11 in Japan and Nov. 17 in United States and Europe, Sony executives said. It will cost about $536 in Japan and $636 in Europe.

The release date and prices, made public at a flashy news conference in Los Angeles, were disclosed with pomp and circumstance, befitting Sony's vigorous effort to keep itself fresh in the minds of video game players.

Sony said it planned to ship six million consoles by the end of March 2007, including two million when the system is introduced in the fall.

Better news:  Paradox announces Europa Universalis III.  Woohoo!

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 12/2003
My Photo

The Places I Left Behind